Keeping up with AI is a full-time job. Compountier keeps you at the frontier.
One living, cited brief, written from the podcasts, papers, articles and release notes you do not have time to read. Less time keeping up, more time building.
24,285 cited facts from 165 sources. Updated Oct 5, 2026.
1 · Sources
We read everything worth reading
Nothing worth reading slips by. A curated set of AI sources: the podcasts and talks, the articles, the research papers read in full, and the tool release notes. We choose and maintain the list, so you do not have to build a feed or keep it clean. Every signal is evaluated, triaged and sorted into single cited facts.
What we read for you
Podcasts and talks · the AI shows worth the hour
Articles and newsletters · the writers who move the field
Research papers · arXiv, read in full, not just the abstract
Tool release notes · what actually shipped this week
Pull any paper in.
Browse arXiv by category or search, and drop what matters into your feed. Read it as a cited brief beside the live PDF, as Research, Executive, Builder or Skeptic, and ask it anything.
One source, broken down
Why Specialized AI Could Beat The God Model
Amjad Masad · Oct 3, 2026 · 16 facts in this brief
Click a fact to read it in full: what it says, why it matters, and who said it.
2 · Briefs
Synthesized into one cited brief
A brief that keeps itself current: what to build, how to build it, the skills that stay scarce, where the moat is, and how to price. Every claim cites straight back to the facts it came from.
This week, in three linesOct 5, 2026 · open a line to read it, cited
A standing synthesis for every topic, too:Agents & Agentic SystemsTrust, Security & EvalsAI Infrastructure & ComputeBuilding AI ProductsAI-Native SkillsBusiness Models & GTM
Also: the standing brief through your own lens, a daily read on what changed and whether it lasts, live signals, and version history.
3 · Curation
You curate what matters so it compounds
From a whole corpus to the one claim you needed. Verify a fact against its source, star it into your collection, ask the corpus anything and keep the answer.
A fact from the corpus
Coding agents stay action-biased under ambiguity: falling target or intent clarity lowers action rate but never drives abstention
Zimo Ji · Coding Agents Are Guessing: Measuring Action-Boundary Violations in Underspecified DevOps Instructions
Never trust, always verify: every fact links to the exact passage it came from.
Ask the corpus
Live, cited answers. No signup.
Live
Try asking
Reshape
Also: keep a version of any brief reshaped for you, write your own notes into a private searchable collection, and ask the corpus from inside Claude or Cursor.
Make it yours
A free account keeps what you do here: your threads, your saved facts, your tailored briefs, and every topic.
Save kernelsAsk historyFull ExploreTailored briefsPapers pipelineSave answers